Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Carroll v. Gatter

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1953No. 32210PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

Pursuant to statute (Rem. Rev. Stat., § 946-2 [cf. RCW 7.48.060]) the prosecuting attorney commenced this action in equity, in the name of the state, to abate the Oxford Hotel in Seattle for six months; to have the contents thereof removed and sold as provided by law; to enjoin any further unlawful acts upon the premises; and to levy a penalty against the defendant owners. After a trial to the court, a decree was entered dismissing the action and allowing costs against the state. Relator has appealed.

Oral testimony was not taken at the trial. Counsel presented a stipulation which read, in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of Tacoma v. HoustonWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  2. State ex rel. English v. FanningNebraska Supreme Court · 1914
  3. State ex rel. English v. FanningNebraska Supreme Court · 1914
  4. State ex rel. Kern v. EmersonWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. State ex rel. Kern v. JeromeWashington Supreme Court · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Wayne County Prosecuting Attorney v. LevenburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State Ex Rel. Wayne County Prosecutor v. Diversified Theatrical Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Thurston County v. GortonWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Spenard Action Committee v. Lot 3, Block 1, Evergreen SubdivisionAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Medical Consultants Northwest, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API