Legal Opinion

State ex rel. English v. Fanning

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1914No. 17,670PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSedgwick, J.

On the former hearing in this case we found that the portion of the decree “which enjoins Panning and Prenica from using the premises for the purpose of lewdness, assignation or prostitution is not appealed from, and is therefore final,” and that the “defendants make no complaint of the findings and decree so far as it finds that unlawful practices were indulged in and enjoins the continuance of the same in the future.” 96 Neb. 123. The record is large and somewhat complicated, but upon further consideration we think it ought to be considered that the appeal has brought up the whole case for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Wilcox v. RyderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. State v. BrunellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  3. State ex rel. English v. FanningNebraska Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Drake v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
  5. State ex rel. Robertson v. New England Furniture & Carpet Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Pompano Horse Club, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. BryanSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. State Ex Rel. Wayne County Prosecuting Attorney v. LevenburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State Ex Rel. Wayne County Prosecutor v. Diversified Theatrical Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Spenard Action Committee v. Lot 3, Block 1, Evergreen SubdivisionAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State Ex Rel. Carroll v. GatterWashington Supreme Court · 1953

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API