Legal Opinion

City of Tacoma v. Houston

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1947No. 29698PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

By complaint filed in the police court of the city of Tacoma, defendant was charged with the crime of operating a house of prostitution. Upon conviction of that offense, he appealed to the superior court, where he was again convicted in a trial before a jury. From the judgment of conviction and sentence, defendant appealed.

The evidence in the case consists solely of the testimony of five police officers. Appellant, Robert Houston, did not himself testify nor did he offer any other evidence. The facts are therefore to be found in the evidence submitted by the prosecution, as follows:

About…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. City of Seattle v. McCreadyWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. CyrWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  4. State v. BrooksWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  5. State v. MelroseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API