Spenard Action Committee v. Lot 3, Block 1, Evergreen Subdivision
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINOWITZ, Justice.
Spenard Action Committee (SAC) instituted an action for abatement of a public nuisance and injunctive relief against Lot 3, Block 1, Evergreen Subdivision (Lot 3), alleging that The Chateau, a massage parlor and escort service located on the property, was operating as a house of prostitution. The superior court denied relief based on its conclusion that SAC had not shown that a public nuisance existed at the time of trial.
On appeal, SAC first argues that the superior court should have established as a matter of law, as a sanction for Lot 3’s alleged discovery…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- United States v. Leslie Fleishman, United States of America v. Peter Combs, United States of America v. Stephen GreenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Ronald BrownCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- John David v. The Hooker, Ltd Hooker Music, Ltd., Ronald Haffkine, Non-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Evans v. McTaggartAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Fernandes v. PortwineAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Sykes v. Melba Creek Mining, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Rausch v. DevineAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- City of Kodiak v. SamaniegoAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.