Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Wayne County Prosecutor v. Diversified Theatrical Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1976No. Docket Nos. 56964, 56965, (Calendar No. 3)PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

The question is whether a statute which provides that a place of lewdness, assignation or prostitution is a public nuisance 1 can properly be applied to motion picture theatres that show films found to be obscene under state and Federal constitutional standards. 2

We assume, without deciding, that the films are obscene. 3 We conclude, however, that the statute was intended to apply to houses of prostitution and not motion picture theatres where sexual acts are not committed but are portrayed on the screen.

I

The Michigan statute is one of a number of "red light abatement acts”, enacted in the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Freedman v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Bantam Books, Inc. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. A Quantity of Copies of Books v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Blount v. RizziSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Tyler v. Livonia Public SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State Ex Rel. Wayne County Prosecuting Attorney v. LevenburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  3. City of Chicago v. Festival Theatre Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State ex rel. Kidwell v. U. S. Marketing, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1981
  5. MICHIGAN Ex Rel WAYNE COUNTY PROSECUTOR v. BENNISMichigan Supreme Court · 1994

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API