State Ex Rel. Wayne County Prosecutor v. Diversified Theatrical Corp.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.
The question is whether a statute which provides that a place of lewdness, assignation or prostitution is a public nuisance 1 can properly be applied to motion picture theatres that show films found to be obscene under state and Federal constitutional standards. 2
We assume, without deciding, that the films are obscene. 3 We conclude, however, that the statute was intended to apply to houses of prostitution and not motion picture theatres where sexual acts are not committed but are portrayed on the screen.
I
The Michigan statute is one of a number of "red light abatement acts”, enacted in the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Freedman v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Bantam Books, Inc. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- A Quantity of Copies of Books v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Blount v. RizziSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Tyler v. Livonia Public SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- State Ex Rel. Wayne County Prosecuting Attorney v. LevenburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- City of Chicago v. Festival Theatre Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
- State ex rel. Kidwell v. U. S. Marketing, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1981
- MICHIGAN Ex Rel WAYNE COUNTY PROSECUTOR v. BENNISMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.