State ex rel. Kern v. Jerome
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Kittitas county, Kauffman, J., entered August 8, 1918, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action to abate a nuisance, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
This action was instituted for the purpose of abating a nuisance and obtaining an injunction against its continuance.
The suit was brought under chapter 127, Laws of 1913, p. 391 (3 Rem. & Bal. Code, § 946-1 et seq.), known as the “Red Light Law,” in the name of the state of Washington, on the relation of the prosecuting attorney of Kittitas county. The defendants were Mary A. Bort and W. H. Bort, her husband, and one Margaret Jerome.
The facts are substantially as follows: At the time of the institution of the suit, and for many years prior thereto, Mrs. Bort was and had been the owner of lots…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hodge v. Muscatine CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Judge v. KribsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
- Hodge v. Muscatine CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Blennerhassett v. Incorporated of Forest CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Donnelly v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Bradford v. BarbiereCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Commonwealth v. United Food Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- State Ex Rel. Carroll v. GatterWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Williams v. State ex rel. McNultySupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
- State ex rel. Kern v. EmersonWashington Supreme Court · 1916
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.