Thurston County v. Gorton
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
Thurston County is seeking a writ of mandamus to compel certain state officials to reimburse the County for filing fees and costs of service of process incurred by the County in connection with 11 habitual traffic offender cases filed by the Thurston County Prosecuting Attorney. In addition to reimbursement, the County seeks an order directing the respondent agencies to pay all filing and service of process costs generated by future habitual traffic offender actions. The sole issue for our determination is whether the costs of an action brought under the Washington Habitual Traffic Offenders…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. ScheffelWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- City of Bellingham v. SchamperaWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- State v. RothWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. HusonWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Ropo, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Jametsky v. OlsenWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- Sim v. Washington State Parks & Recreation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- R.B. v. C.W.Washington Supreme Court · 2016
- United States v. Michael BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Terry v. City of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.