Legal Opinion

Mattel, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 8, 1976No. C.D. 4639; Court Nos. 70/42525, etcPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maletz, Judge:

The question involved in this consolidated action is the proper tariff classification of articles invoiced as “voice units” that were imported from Mexico in 1968 and 1969.

The importations were classified by the government under item 737.90 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States, as modified by T.D. 68-9, as parts of toys, not specially provided for, and assessed with duty at the rate of 31 percent or 28 percent ad valorem, depending upon the date of entry.

Plaintiff contends that the articles are properly classifiable under item 685.32 of the tariff schedules, as modified…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. The United States v. New York Merchandise Co., Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  2. Trans-Atlantic Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  3. United States v. Flex Track Equipment Ltd.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  4. United States v. Oxford International Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
  5. United States v. Acec Electric Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ozen Sound Devices v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1980
  2. Data Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1982
  3. Mitsubishi International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
  4. Amico, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
  5. Ozen Sound Devices v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API