Legal Opinion

United States v. Acec Electric Corp.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 8, 1973No. 5475, C.A.D. 1091PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Clakk, Justice.

This is an appeal from the decision and judgment of the United States Customs Court, Second Division1 sustaining appallee’s protest against the assessment of duty at 10 percent ad valorem on merchandise described as a clutch motor used on industrial sewing machines and classified under item 672.25 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS) as “Other” parts of sewing machines. Appellee successfully claimed that the merchandise is classifiable under item 682.40, TSUS, as motors of over %o but under 200 horsepower and dutiable at 8.5 percent ad valorem. We reverse.

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Servo-Tek Products Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  2. Acec Electric Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Jvc Company of America, Division of Us Jvc Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  2. Nidec Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. Oxford International Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
  4. ASEA, INC. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
  5. Sanyo Electric Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API