Data Products Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Maletz, Judge:
Presented for determination in this action is the question whether certain articles are properly classified as parts of office machines or parts of printing machinery. The articles — paper feed tractors and character drum assemblies which are parts of line printers — were classified as parts of office machines under item 676.52 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS) and assessed the column 2 rate of 35 percent ad valorem. “Office machines” are defined in the TSUS as follows:
Classified Under Schedule 6, Part 4
Subpart G. — Office Machines
Subpart G headnotes:
1. This…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Nippon Kogaku (USA), Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- Trans-Atlantic Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- United States v. Texas Instruments, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- International Spring Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980
- General Methods Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Digital Equipment Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- Abitibi Price Sales Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
- Apple Computer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
- Sumitronics Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995