Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Ozen Sound Devices v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 1, 1980No. C.A.D. 1246; No. 79-37PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Judge.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the U.S. Customs Court in Ozen Sound Devices v. United States, 83 Cust. Ct. 29, C.D. 4816, 476 F. Supp. 1078 (1979), which upheld the classification of the imported merchandise under item 737.95 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS) as parts of toys, not specifically provided for. We affirm.

Background

The imported merchandise is a talking mechanism inserted into dolls or other objects to reproduce prerecorded sayings. It includes a turntable, spindle, tone arm assembly, stylus, loudspeaker cone, and a record which is…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Schott Optical Glass, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  2. E. Green & Son (New York), Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  3. Robert Bosch Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  4. Englishtown Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  5. Hirsch v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. E.M. Chemicals v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  2. C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
  3. United States v. Siemens America, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
  4. Amersham Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
  5. Rohm and Haas Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API