Trans-Atlantic Co. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Clark, Justice.
The issue raised on this appeal from the United States Customs Court, Third Division, involves a very simple question which is, as stated by appellant, whether or not the merchandise involved here is a hinge or a door closer. Appellant concedes that the device in question is “a kind of hinge” but claims that it “is more than a hinge” — it also closes the door and is, therefore, “a kind of door closer.” The Bureau of Customs, however, classified the merchandise as hinges, and the United States Customs Court affirmed, 67 Cust. Ct. 296, C.D. 4288 (1971). We agree and affirm that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- E. Green & Son (New York), Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Trans-Atlantic Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
3Cited by65 opinions
- Mita Copystar America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Nippon Kogaku (USA), Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- CamelBak Products, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Schott Optical Glass, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- Rosemary Fortin v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary, Department of Labor, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.