Legal Opinion

Mitsubishi International Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 26, 1977No. C.D. 4686; Court No. 73-9-02678PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Re, Judge:

The questions presented in this case, which involves nine entries, pertain to the valuation and classification of certain merchandise imported into the United States. The merchandise consists of three complete and four partial penstocks imported from Japan, and entered at Los Angeles, California from December 8, 1969 to October 7, 1971.

A penstock is a conduit or pipe for conducting water. As described by one of the witnesses, David Anderson, a mechanical design engineer with the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, and contract administrator of the penstock contract under…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. CitroenSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. United States v. BrechnerUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  3. E. Green & Son (New York), Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  4. Nomura (America) Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  5. Nomura (America) Corp. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
  2. Baxter Healthcare Corp. of Puerto Rico v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
  3. Beacon Cycle & Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
  4. E & S Freedman Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API