United States v. Oxford International Corp.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Rich, Judge.
This Government appeal is from the judgment of the United States Customs Court, 72 Cust. Ct. 187, C.D. 4540, 375 F. Supp. 1369 (1974), sustaining appellee’s claim protesting against the classification of goods commonly known as “bicycle mirrors,” under Item 544.51, TSUS, as “Mirrors, * * * with or without frames or cases * * *: Not over 1 sq. ft. in reflecting area.” Appellee claimed that the proper classification ivas under Item 732.36, TSUS, as “Other parts of bicycles,” relying on the “more than” doctrine. We reverse.
The question before us is one of law, there being no…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- The United States v. New York Merchandise Co., Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- United States v. Flex Track Equipment Ltd.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- United States v. Acec Electric Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- Pollard Bearings Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
- Kempner v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Texas Instruments Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
- Janex Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
- Ashflash Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976
- ASEA, INC. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
- United States v. Ataka America, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.