Conway v. City of Hartford
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The plaintiff, Trevor Conway, appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to open a judgment of nonsuit. The plaintiff claims that the court improperly denied his motion to open the judgment pursuant to General Statutes § 52-212 (a)1 and Practice *631Book § 17-43.2 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our consideration of this appeal. The plaintiff, Trevor Conway, was employed by the defendant city of Hartford (city) from 1984 to 1993, when he was laid off. The plaintiff is a transsexual. When hired by the city, the…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Bank of Boston Connecticut v. SchlesingerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Automotive Twins, Inc. v. KleinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Pantlin & Chananie Development Corp. v. Hartford Cement & Building Supply Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Jaconski v. AMF, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by7 opinions
- City of Hartford v. Pan Pacific Development (Connecticut), Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Carr v. Fleet BankConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Misata v. Con-Way Transportation Services, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Estela v. Bristol Hospital, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Stanley Shenker & Associates, Inc. v. World Wrestling Federation Entertainment, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.