Legal Opinion
Pantlin & Chananie Development Corp. v. Hartford Cement & Building Supply Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 14, 1985No. 12248PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDannehy, J.
The primary issue raised by this appeal is whether it was an abuse of discretion for the trial court, Curran, J., to refuse to open and set aside a *234default judgment discharging the defendant’s mechanic’s lien on the real property of the plaintiff.
This is a second appeal by the defendant involving the same parties and the same subject matter. See Pantlin & Chananie Development Corporation v. Hartford Cement & Building Supply Co., 188 Conn. 253, 449 A.2d 162 (1982). The detailed statement in that opinion includes all of the material facts upon which the issues relevant to this appeal rest.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Barnes v. BarnesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Automotive Twins, Inc. v. KleinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Treat v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Edgewood Construction Co. v. West Haven Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Costello v. Hartford Institute of Accounting, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- In re Baby Girl B.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Jaconski v. AMF, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Biro v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Postemski v. LandonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Woodruff v. RileyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.