Legal Opinion
Jaconski v. AMF, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 12, 1988No. 13375PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.
This is an appeal by the plaintiffs from the trial court’s nonsuit of their case for failure to comply with an order of the court. We find no error.
This products liability action was commenced in March, 1986, and assigned to the trial court under the “individual calendar” program. The plaintiffs are Scott Jaconski and his wife, Catherine Jaconski, who were injured while riding a motorcycle manufactured and sold by the defendants, AMF, Inc. (AMF), Harley-Davidson Motor Co., Inc. (Harley Motor), and Harley-Davidson Sales Corporation (Harley Sales). On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the trial…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Automotive Twins, Inc. v. KleinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Pavlinko v. Yale-New Haven HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Gionfrido v. Wharf Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Pantlin & Chananie Development Corp. v. Hartford Cement & Building Supply Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Jaquith v. RevsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Lacasse v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Millbrook Owners Ass'n v. Hamilton StandardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Eldridge v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Ruddock v. BurrowesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- TLC Development, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.