Stanley Shenker & Associates, Inc. v. World Wrestling Federation Entertainment, Inc.
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.
Throughout the course of this litigation, the plaintiff Stanley Shenker & Associates, Inc. (associates or plaintiff), has engaged in serious misconduct during the discovery process.
*358After more than two years of extensive discovery in the present case, including four discovery extensions, the production of more than 92,000 pages of documents, the taking of more than twenty-five depositions, and the filing of more than 150 motions, briefs and other pleadings, the plaintiff, through its president and sole owner Stanley Shenker, now admits to having committed acts throughout the course of this…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Salim Aoude v. Mobil Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Shaunte Dotson v. Jaimie Bravo, Officer, Star 4123, and City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Barnhill v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Millbrook Owners Ass'n v. Hamilton StandardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. v. Jakks Pacific, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. v. Jakks Pacific, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Dollarhide v. BancroftWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
- World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. v. Jakks Pacific, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. v. Jakks Pacific, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009