Legal Opinion
Carr v. Fleet Bank
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 19, 2002No. AC 22260PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The plaintiff, Corine Carr, appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying her motion to open the judgment of dismissal. The plaintiff claims that the court improperly denied the motion because the defendant, Fleet Bank, acted fraudulently by failing to provide her with the name of its registered agent for service of process, which led to the judgment of dismissal. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
*594The following procedural history is relevant. On December 1, 2000, the plaintiff endeavored to commence an action against the defendant seeking damages for injuries she allegedly…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Conway v. City of HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Macricostas v. KovacsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Pospisil v. PospisilConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Carlin Contracting Co. v. Department of Consumer ProtectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
4Cited by7 opinions
- Chiulli v. ZolaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- McGuire v. McGuireConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. Takata Corp.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2017
- Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp. v. MachadoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Rino Gnesi Co. v. SbriglioConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.