Legal Opinion

Bank of Boston Connecticut v. Schlesinger

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 13, 1991No. 14270PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.

This is a suit on a personal guaranty of promissory notes. This appeal arises out of the granting of a prejudgment attachment in favor of the plaintiff, Bank of Boston Connecticut,1 that imposed a lien on certain partnership interests of the defendants, Richard Schlesinger and William Weinstein. The issues are whether the trial court improperly: (1) granted the prejudgment attachment on the defendants’ partnership interests rather than on the Waterbury Industrial Commons, the property that secured the notes (the property); (2) admitted into evidence expert testimony (a) about environmental…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Solomon v. AbermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Augeri v. C. F. Wooding Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  3. New England Land Co. v. DeMarkeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  4. Sanderson v. Steve Snyder Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  5. Demar v. Open Space & Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Tallmadge Bros. v. Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  2. Connecticut National Bank v. GiacomiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. Walton v. Town of New HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  4. Levine v. MasseySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  5. Herbert S. Newman & Partners, P.C. v. CFC Construction Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API