Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Richland Irrigation District

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 1932No. 23513. En BancPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

J. T. Roberts, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, brought this action to enjoin the Richland Irrigation District and its directors and the commissioners and the treasurer of Benton county from levying’, or spreading’ upon the record of the county, any assessment for the payment of the interest or the principal of the district’s bonds (which were issued to pay for district improvements),

“ . . . against any particular tract of land within said district which will require the payment by the owner of said land of an amount in excess of the special benefit actually accruing to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Malott v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  2. State ex rel. Clancy v. Columbia Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Cosman v. Chestnut Valley Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Kadow v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. State Ex Rel. Wells v. HartungWashington Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. In Re the Dissolution & Disorganization of Horse Heaven Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Roberts v. Richland Irrigation DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. State v. Human Relations Research FoundationWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Rosebud Land & Improvement Co. v. Carterville Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API