Legal Opinion
Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply System
Washington Supreme Court
Decided February 17, 1988No. 52559-5PublishedCited by 342 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Brachtenbach, J. —
This case involves various bondholders' claims against the Washington Public Power Supply System (Supply System) and others for injuries resulting from the Supply System's default on $2.25 billion in revenue bonds issued to finance construction of two nuclear power generating plants. The trial court dismissed all bondholders' claims for their failure to state a claim for relief pursuant to CR 12(b)(6). We granted direct review and reverse the trial court's judgment on several issues.
Respondent Supply System is a "joint operating agency" and municipal corporation established…
2Cases cited171 opinions
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
166 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by342 opinions
- Ernst & Young, L.L.P. v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
- Bily v. Arthur Young & Co.California Supreme Court · 1992
- Panag v. Farmers Ins. Co. of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- Havens v. C & D PLASTICS, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
- Livid Holdings Ltd. v. Salomon Smith Barney, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
337 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.