Legal Opinion

Rosebud Land & Improvement Co. v. Carterville Irrigation District

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1936No. 7,542PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews

Appeal from a judgment perpetually enjoining the assessment or charging a certain tract of land, then owned by the Bosebud Land & Improvement Company, with any taxes or assessments for bond interest of the Carterville Irrigation District.

The complaint, filed in applying for the injunction, shows the following facts: The district was established in 1909, and the following year it issued bonds for $335,000 for the purchase of water rights and construction of an irrigation system; $320,000 of these bonds are still outstanding. The tract of land in suit was included in the district and duly…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. State Ex Rel. Malott v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Roberts v. Richland Irrigation DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Scilley v. Red Lodge-Rosebud Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Anglo-Californian Bank, Ltd. v. FieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lowery v. Garfield CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Jensen Livestock Co. v. Custer CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Vail v. Custer CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Cascade County v. WeaverMontana Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Toole County Irr. Dist. v. MoodyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API