Legal Opinion

Kadow v. Paul

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 18, 1927No. 241PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Taft

This is a writ of error to a decree of the Supreme Court of Washington. The original action was brought in the Superior Court of Clarke County, of that State, to have the proceedings in the organization of Diking Improvement District No. 3 of that county declared void, because certain portions of the statute under which the district was formed were unconstitutional, and to restrain the defendants from taking any steps looking to the construction of the proposed improvement or the sale by the county of bonds tó finance it. After a trial on the merits, the trial court dismissed the petition,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hagar v. Reclamation District No. 108Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Norris v. Montezuma Valley Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918
  4. Orr v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. Orr v. AllenDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928
  2. Rohwer v. GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Elko Lamoille Power Co. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
  4. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. NoelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
  5. Municipal Investors Assn. v. BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API