Roberts v. Richland Irrigation District
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds
Richland Irrigation District is a corporation organized under the laws of Washington; and appellant owns forty acres of agricultural lánd within its limits. In 1920, at an election duly held, a majority of the votes cast (appellant objecting) authorized the Directors to issue and sell $538,000 of its interest-bearing bonds. This was done and the proceeds were devoted to improvements for irrigation purposes as contemplated. Interest on the bonds was made payable semi-annually; the principal in annual installments commencing July 1, 1931.
For ten years the Directors assessed against separate…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Houck v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Valley Farms Co. of Yonkers v. County of WestchesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Utley v. St. PetersburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Gaynor v. MarohnNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- In Re the Dissolution & Disorganization of Horse Heaven Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1941
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.