Legal Opinion
Cosman v. Chestnut Valley Irrigation District
Montana Supreme Court
Decided July 14, 1925No. 5,731PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HONORABLE THEODORE LENTZ, District Judge, sitting in place of MR. CHIEF JUSTICE CALLAWAY,
absent on account of illness, delivered the opinion of the court.
In the complaint in this action it is alleged, among other things, that the plaintiff is the owner of land in the Chestnut Valley irrigation district; that the district has regularly issued and sold its bonds in the sum of $140,000; that in conformity with the statutory requirements the board of commissioners levied a tax for the year 1922 sufficient in amount to pay the interest on the bonds for the year 1923; that plaintiff paid the full…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Norris v. Montezuma Valley Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918
- Interstate Trust Co. v. Montezuma Valley Irrigation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
- McCormack v. PatchinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Malott v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1930
- Klemm v. DavenportSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
- Scilley v. Red Lodge-Rosebud Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1928
- River Farms Co. v. California GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- State Ex Rel. Wells v. HartungWashington Supreme Court · 1929
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.