Legal Opinion
Borges v. Art Steel Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 27, 1956PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIMOCK, District Judge.
Plaintiffs sue, pursuant to 50 U.S.C. App. § 459, to recover increased wages that they claim they would have been entitled to receive had they remained at work instead of entering the armed forces. Plaintiffs are employees of defendant who left defendant’s employment when they were inducted into the armed forces. Upon discharge from military service, they were reinstated with full seniority rights for the period of time served in the armed forces, but at the same salary that they were earning when they departed.
During the period when they were in the armed forces,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Oakley v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Diehl v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Diehl v. Lehigh Valley R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
3Cited by5 opinions
- Borges v. Art Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Manuel Borges v. Art Steel Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Borges v. Art Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Alfarone v. Fairchild Engine & Airplane Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1963
- Randall v. Giant Food Markets, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1974