Legal Opinion
Diehl v. Lehigh Valley R. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 3, 1954No. 11022_1PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Chief Judge.
This appeal requires a construction of Section 8 of the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, as amended. 1 On June 24, 1942, Diehl was employed as a “car-man helper” by the Lehigh Valley Railroad Company. A car-man helper’s job fell into a sub-class of a division of the craft of “car-men” under a collective bargaining agreement executed by Diehl’s union and the railroad. On February 19, 1943, Diehl was promoted to a job of "set-up car-man inspector”, the equivalent for our purposes of a “temporary car-man mechanic”.
On April 15, 1943, Diehl entered the armed forces.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Trailmobile Co. v. WhirlsSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Aeronautical Industrial District Lodge 727 v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Oakley v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Tilton v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Diehl v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Derlyn E. Moe v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Chenault v. Otis Engineering CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
- National Labor Relations Board v. Textile MacHine Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.