Oakley v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burton
In both No. 28 and No. 29, the issue is whether, under the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, 1 one year of reemployment of a veteran by his preservice employer terminated that veteran’s right to the seniority to which he was entitled by virtue of that Act’s treatment of him as though he had remained continuously in his civilian employment. For the reasons hereinafter stated, and pursuant to our previous decisions, our answer is “No.” In No. 29, there is the further question whether, after the expiration of such year, a United States District Court could entertain a complaint filed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Trailmobile Co. v. WhirlsSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Aeronautical Industrial District Lodge 727 v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Oakley v. Louisville & N. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
- Haynes v. Southern Railway SystemCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
3Cited by70 opinions
- Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Alabama Power Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Monroe v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- McKinney v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Tilton v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.