Legal Opinion

Diehl v. Lehigh Valley Railroad

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 14, 1955No. 246PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*960Certiorari, 348 U. S. 860, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

2Per curiam

Upon the facts disclosed in the opinion of the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, 211 F. 2d 95, the applicable Acts of Congress, and the opinion of this Court in Oakley v. Louisville & Nashville R. Co., 338 U. S. 278, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed. Mr. Justice Reed dissents for the reasons given in the opinion of the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Burger and Samuel D. Slade filed a memorandum for the United States, as…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Oakley v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Diehl v. Lehigh Valley R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954

4Cited by59 opinions

  1. Thomas E. Blunt v. United States of America, Thomas E. Blunt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  2. Tilton v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. State v. BuckWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. John A. Naples v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
  5. People v. ChambersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API