Manuel Borges v. Art Steel Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
In this action by eleven employees of defendant to recover increased wages which they claim they would have been entitled to receive had they remained at work instead of entering the armed forces, Judge Dimock granted a summary judgment holding that plaintiffs were entitled to the claimed increases; but he did not then fix the amounts, saying in his opinion, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 143 F.Supp. 169, 170: “The parties are agreed that, if summary judgment is granted the question of the actual dollar amount which each plaintiff should receive shall await subsequent determination by the parties and, if…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Audi Vision Inc. v. RCA Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Richard G. King v. The California Company, Gulf Refining Company, Placid Oil Company, Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Company and Sam GrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Wynn v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Tye v. Hertz Drivurself Stations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- Borges v. Art Steel Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
3Cited by12 opinions
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. WetzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- In the Matter of Ron C. Cross, Bankrupt. Murphy & Robinson Investment Company v. Ron C. CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Frederick McGill v. James C. ParsonsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Wheatland Irrigation District v. McGuireWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
- Favell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.