Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas
Petitioner is an employee of the Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corporation. He entered its employ in 1942 and *278worked for it at a shipyard until he was inducted into the, Army in 1943. He served in the Army a little over a year and was honorably discharged and received a certificate to that effect. He had worked for the corporation as a welder and, after his tour of duty in the Army ended, he was still qualified to perform the duties of a welder. Within forty days of his discharge, he applied to the corporation, as was his right under the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, 54 Stat. 885,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Stoll v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by596 opinions
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United Public Workers of America v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Henderson v. ShinsekiSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
591 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.