Legal Opinion

Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 27, 1946No. 970PublishedCited by 596 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas

Petitioner is an employee of the Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corporation. He entered its employ in 1942 and *278worked for it at a shipyard until he was inducted into the, Army in 1943. He served in the Army a little over a year and was honorably discharged and received a certificate to that effect. He had worked for the corporation as a welder and, after his tour of duty in the Army ended, he was still qualified to perform the duties of a welder. Within forty days of his discharge, he applied to the corporation, as was his right under the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, 54 Stat. 885,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Stoll v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by596 opinions

  1. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United Public Workers of America v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Henderson v. ShinsekiSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

591 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API