Legal Opinion
Alfarone v. Fairchild Engine & Airplane Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 3, 1963No. 61-C-280PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ZAVATT, Chief Judge.
The plaintiff, a veteran of the armed forces of the United States, sues to recover sums allegedly due him pursuant to the Universal Military Training and Service Act, 50 U.S.C.App. § 451 et seq., and more particularly § 459 thereof. Both parties have moved, pursuant to Rule 56 Fed.R.Civ.P., for summary judgment.
There is no dispute as to the following facts: The plaintiff entered the employ of the defendant in its Engine Division in January of 1952 and continued in the defendant’s employ until June 1955 when he was inducted into the armed forces. At that time there was in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McKinney v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Derlyn E. Moe v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Nevins v. Curtiss-Wright Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949
- Altgens v. The Associated PressCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
- Borges v. Art Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Alfarone v. Fairchild Stratos Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1963
- Hatton v. Tabard Press Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967