Legal Opinion

Webber v. Inland Empire Investments, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 10, 1999No. E020383, E021506PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HOLLENHORST, J.

This case was submitted to the jury on a seventh cause of action alleging that defendants conspired to intentionally interfere with a contractual relationship. Agreeing with plaintiff, Donald G. Webber, the jury returned a special verdict in his favor.

The subsequent judgment awarded plaintiff Webber the sum of $1,254,946 in general damages against defendants Inland Empire Investments, Inc. (Inland), James P. Previti and Forecast Corporation, plus $50,000 in punitive damages against defendant Inland, and $50,000 in punitive damages against defendant Forecast Corporation,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Reynolds Metals Co. v. AlpersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Imperial Ice Co. v. RossierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Roseleaf Corp. v. ChierighinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Glendale Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Marina View Heights Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Spinks v. Equity Residential Briarwood ApartmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Misik v. D'ArcoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Textron Financial Corp. v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Woods v. FOX BROADCASTING SUB., INC.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Benson v. Kwikset Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2007

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API