Legal Opinion
Misik v. D'Arco
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 27, 2011No. B224203PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KITCHING, J.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Thomas Misik appeals from an order denying his motion to amend the jhdgment to add defendant Thomas R. D’Arco to the judgment as a judgment debtor. The judgment had found Sayrahan Group, LLC (Sayrahan), liable for breach of contract. The motion to amend the judgment relied on the alter ego doctrine to argue that the trial court should find that D’Arco was the alter ego of Sayrahan and should hold D’Arco liable for the judgment. The trial court appears to have denied the motion to amend the judgment because it erroneously believed that procedural…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lakin v. Watkins Associated IndustriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Mesler v. Bragg Management Co.California Supreme Court · 1985
- Wood v. Elling Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
- Greenspan v. LADT LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Leek v. CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Toho-Towa Co. v. Morgan Creek Productions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Highland Springs Conference & Training Center v. City of BanningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Twenty-Nine Palms Enterprises Corp. v. BardosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Hearn Pacific Corp. v. Second Generation Roofing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Burkhalter Kessler Clement & George LLP v. Hamilton, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.