Legal Opinion
Benson v. Kwikset Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 29, 2007No. G030956PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1262Opinion
RYLAARSDAM, Acting P. J.
INTRODUCTION
In 2000, plaintiff James Benson, on behalf of the general public, sued defendants Kwikset Corporation, its parent corporation, Black & Decker Corporation (collectively defendants), plus Technolock, S. A. de C. V. (Technolock) for restitution and injunctive relief under the unfair competition law (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200) and the false advertising law (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17500; all further statutory references are to the Business and Professions Code unless otherwise indicated). Plaintiff alleged defendants violated statutory provisions…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- People v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Klein v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Brady v. Bayer Corp., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Griffin Dewatering Corp. v. Northern Ins. Co. of New YorkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Lafferty v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.