Legal Opinion
Skulnick v. Roberts Express, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 15, 1992No. Docket Nos. D012074, D012110PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NARES, J.
Roberts Express, Inc. (Roberts), and Mediquik Express, Inc. (Mediquik), appeal a judgment on a stipulated settlement entered pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure 1 section 664.6. 2 The judgment includes an order forbidding the settling parties from asserting their indemnification rights. Roberts and Mediquik argue they never agreed to waive their indemnification rights as part of any settlement, and contend the court therefore entered an improper judgment. However, there is substantial evidence in the record that Roberts and Mediquik stipulated to a settlement in which they…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Driscoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Stambaugh v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Corkland v. BoscoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- McClure v. McClureCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Gorman v. HolteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Feduniak v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Spray, Gould & Bowers v. Associated International InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- National American Insurance v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's LondonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Ebensteiner Co., Inc. v. Chadmar GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Terry v. ConlanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.