Legal Opinion
National American Insurance v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 15, 1996No. 94-55047PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed June 30,1995 and amended August 24,1995 is withdrawn.
OPINION
SHUBB, District Judge:
In July 1991, National American Insurance Company of California (“National”) brought this diversity action in the district court to collect on two reinsurance policies issued in the early 1960’s by various underwriters at Lloyd’s, London (collectively the “Underwriters”). The Underwriters appeal from a summary judgment awarding National approximately $2,930,325, plus pre-judgment interest.1 We affirm in part, and reverse in part.
I
National is the successor in interest of the Stuyvesant…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- North River Insurance Company v. Cigna Reinsurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Admiral InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Jose S. Chacon v. Tana WoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Dart Industries, Inc. v. Commercial Union Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Kevin Simmons v. G. ArnettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Michigan Township Participating Plan v. Federal InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Reliastar Life Insurance Company v. Ioa Re, Inc. Swiss Re Life Canada, the Reinsurance Association, Amicus on Behalf OfCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- Alfred Banks v. Acs EducationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.