Legal Opinion
Corkland v. Boscoe
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 5, 1984No. A015176PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KING, J.
In this case we hold that if parties to pending litigation stipulate orally before the court or in writing to a settlement of all or a part of the case, the trial court upon the motion of a party may enter judgment pursuant to the terms of the settlement. The Legislature has now provided that a motion to enter judgment pursuant to such a settlement need not be a motion for summary judgment.
Jerrold A. Boscoe and Ducorp, Inc., appeal from an order in two consolidated cases granting a motion by Alvin Corkland to compel enforcement of a settlement agreement. We affirm the order.
In…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gregory v. HamiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Reifler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Gopal v. YoshikawaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Ford v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Hastings v. MatlockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Weddington Productions, Inc. v. FlickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Levy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re Marriage of AssemiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Harris v. Rudin, Richman & AppelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Gorman v. HolteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.