Legal Opinion
Terry v. Conlan
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 16, 2005No. H026751, H026887, H027302PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUSHING, P. J. —
The three consolidated appeals discussed in this opinion arise from the settlement of a long, arduous trial over the validity of two competing trust instruments of Garth Conlan. The parties to the dispute are lone N. Conlan, Garth’s widow, and Garth’s three adult children from a previous marriage. The first trust instrument, which lone claims is valid, is an inter vivas trust that Garth executed in 1999 leaving Garth’s community property interests to lone. The second trust instrument was drafted shortly before Garth died in 2001, and left all of his property to his…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Weddington Productions, Inc. v. FlickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Evans v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Duffill v. Los Angeles Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Dingwell v. SeymourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Skulnick v. Roberts Express, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Perfumebay. Com Inc. v. eBay, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Donahue v. DonahueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- OSUMI v. SuttonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Critzer v. EnosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Chan v. LundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.