Legal Opinion

McClure v. McClure

California Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1893No. 15188PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Lake County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Vanclief, C.

Action to foreclose a mortgage executed by defendant to secure his promissory note for two thousand dollars made to his wife, Mrs. M. E. McClure, and by her assigned to the plaintiff, who is the son of defendant and his said wife.

The only defense upon which any point made here is that there was no consideration for the note or mortgage.

The judgment was in favor of the plaintiff, and defendant appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

It is contended by counsel for appellant that the evidence does not justify the finding by the court, that *340there…

2Cited by32 opinions

  1. Bradley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Lealao v. Beneficial California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Union Collection Co. v. BuckmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Neary v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Stambaugh v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API