Legal Opinion
Ebensteiner Co., Inc. v. Chadmar Group
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 11, 2006No. B184525PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
49 Cal.Rptr.3d 825 (2006)
143 Cal.App.4th 1174
The EBENSTEINER COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
The CHADMAR GROUP, Defendant and Respondent.
No. B184525.
Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Five.
October 11, 2006.
Law Offices of Barry K. Rothman and Barry K. Rothman, Los Angeles, for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis, and Randal J.A. Ivor-Smith, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Respondent.
TURNER, P.J.
Plaintiff, The Ebensteiner Company, Inc., has appealed from the demurrer dismissal of its second amended complaint. The second amended…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Eye Dog Foundation v. State Board of Guide Dogs for the BlindCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Folsom v. Butte County Assn. of GovernmentsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Lundquist v. ReusserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Burch v. GeorgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Coleman v. DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL ADMININISTRATIONCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Giraldo v. Department of Corrections & RehabilitationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- South Sutter, LLC v. Lj Sutter Partners, L.PCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- City of Cerritos v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- S.M. v. E.P.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Kunde v. SeilerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.