Legal Opinion

State v. Vanornum

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 2013No. CC 200818082A; CA A142341; SC S060715PublishedCited by 301 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*616LINDER, J.

Defendant appealed his conviction for resisting arrest, ORS 162.315, raising, among other issues, two claims that the trial court erred in instructing the jury. The Court of Appeals concluded that it was barred from reviewing those claims by ORCP 59 H, which states that “a party may not obtain review on appeal” of an asserted error in giving or failing to give an instruction unless the party objected in a specified manner. We allowed defendant’s petition for review to consider whether ORCP 59 H applies to and controls appellate court review of claims of instructional error,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. GornickOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. LaundyOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  5. State v. RamirezOregon Supreme Court · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by301 opinions

  1. State v. UleryOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State v. ChitwoodOregon Supreme Court · 2022
  3. State v. DilalloOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State v. HortonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  5. State v. SkotlandOregon Supreme Court · 2024

296 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API