J. Arlie Bryant, Inc. v. Columbia River Gorge Commission
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.
Petitioner seeks review of the Columbia River Gorge Commission’s (commission) order directing a five-year phaseout of petitioner’s quarry operation located in the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area. We affirm.
Petitioner’s principal arguments are that the commission lacked statutory and regulatory authority to order a phaseout of an allegedly nonconforming use. Petitioner acknowledges that it did not raise those issues below, but contends we should reach them nevertheless because they present “a matter of profound public consequence” that “transeend[s] the interests of the present…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Application of Portland General Elec. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Saxon v. Division of State LandsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
3Cited by32 opinions
- State v. JuryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Miller v. CC Meisel Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- In re the Marriage of NimanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Vance v. FordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.