Legal Opinion

State v. Lovern

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 31, 2010No. CM0720620; A137247PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for 16 counts of sexual abuse in the first degree. ORS 163.427. In his first two assignments of error, he argues that the trial court erred in admitting a medical doctor’s testimony regarding the “process of disclosure” and recantation by sexual abuse victims. His third assignment of error challenges the trial court’s admission of the doctor’s medical diagnosis that the complainant had been sexually abused. As explained below, we agree with defendant that the latter ruling was, in all events, “an error of law apparent on the face of the record,”…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Peeples v. LampertOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. State v. LowellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. State v. BarboeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. State v. HigginsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  5. B. A. v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API