Legal Opinion

State v. Coverstone

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 29, 2014No. 11C43542; A150475PublishedCited by 109 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.

Defendant appeals judgments convicting him of multiple counts of sodomy and sexual abuse, contending that the trial court erred in ordering him to pay $8,000 in court-appointed attorney fees in the absence of evidence in the record of his ability to pay those fees. Defendant acknowledges that his claim of error is unpreserved but asks us to review and correct the error as “an error of law apparent on the record,” ORAP 5.45(1), or “plain error.” The state disputes that the error here is plain and, in any event, contends that we should not exercise our discretion to correct it. As explained…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. JuryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. State v. PendergraphtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. State v. KanuchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by109 opinions

  1. State v. Ramirez-HernandezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. State v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. State v. BacoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. State v. FleetCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. State v. ChavezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API