Phipps v. Stancliff
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BELT, J. —
Did the court err in submitting this case to the jury and in entering judgment upon the verdict rendered? There is ample testimony tending to establish plaintiff’s claim of title by adverse possession, but the vital question is whether there is any evidence to the contrary. It was stipulated by the parties hereto that the land in controversy
“was not assessed by Douglas County, Oregon, for State and County taxes prior to the year 1901; that said Lot Nine (9) was assessed by said county for State and County taxes for the years 1901 to 1915, inclusive, in the name of the Oregon and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Holtzman v. DouglasSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Wallace v. American Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1924
- Hudelson v. Sanders-Swafford Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1924
- Todd v. WeedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Kellogg v. FordOregon Supreme Court · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Reeves v. PortaOregon Supreme Court · 1943
- Musulin v. Woodtek, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Godell v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- MacVeagh v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1928
- Whitley v. JacobsOregon Supreme Court · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.