Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

MacVeagh v. Multnomah County

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1928PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

This is a suit in equity, whereby the constitutionality of Chapter 89, General Laws of Oregon, 1913, codified as Sections 4652-4679, Oregon Laws, is challenged. Among other things, the plaintiffs’ complaint avers:

“That the county commissioners of Multnomah County, Oregon, by an order duly made and entered on the 24th day of April, 1922, laid out, designated, and created within Multnomah County, Oregon, that certain road assessment district known and designated as ‘Road Assessment District No. 2, Multnomah County, Oregon, for. the Improvement of County Road No. 1006,’ and that all of the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Bridal Veil Lumbering Co. v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Winn v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Wallace v. American Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Clinton v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1894

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Dept. of Trans. v. LundbergOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Wisconsin Valley Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Port of Umatilla v. RICHMONDOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Friesen v. FuitenOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Agan v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API