Musulin v. Woodtek, Inc.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcALLISTEE, J.
This is an action on a promissory note in the amount of $80,000, executed in the name of defendant Woodtek, Inc., by Charles Bernert, defendant’s general manager and vice president. Plaintiff is the payee. Woodtek defended on the grounds that there was no consideration for the note, and that Bernert was without authority to execute it. The trial was to a jury, which returned a verdict for plaintiff. Defendant appeals from the judgment entered on the verdict.
The note was given in connection with the purchase by defendant of all the shares in Musulin Forest Products, Inc., in which plaintiff…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Capital City Bank v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
- Ireland v. MitchellOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Kiddle v. SchnitzerOregon Supreme Court · 1941
- Phipps v. StancliffOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Sherman, Clay & Co. v. Buffum & PendletonOregon Supreme Court · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Graham v. Public Employees Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- SAFECO INSURANCE CO. OF AM. v. HirschmannWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Shadbolt v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- A-1 Sandblasting & Steamcleaning Co. v. BaidenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- First National Bank of Elgin v. AchilliAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.