Legal Opinion

Hudelson v. Sanders-Swafford Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1924PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.

The defendant, N. E. Dodd, appeals from a judgment which the plaintiffs recovered against him as garnishee. The material facts are: The Sanders-Swafford Company, a corporation, was the owner and in possession of certain personal property consisting of horses, cattle, hogs and certain farm implements and machinery upon a farm in its possession at North Powder, Oregon. The corporation, on March 25, 1921, borrowed from A. A. Smith, trustee, the sum of $4,000, giving a promissory note therefor signed by the corporation and by E. M. Sanders individually. By its terms the note was payable one year…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Deering v. QuiveyOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Patty v. Salem Flouring Mills Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Ladd & Tilton v. MasonOregon Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Hoyt v. ClemansSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  5. Minneapolis Threshing Machine Co. v. CalhounSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Far West Landscaping, Inc. v. Pacific Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Seufert v. StadelmanOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Jaloff v. United Auto Indemnity ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Godell v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Eagle Air, Inc. v. Corroon & Black/Dawson & Co. of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1982

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API